Up front and open, shrouded in secrecy, or somewhere in between? A Meta Research Systematic Review of Open Science Practices in Sport Medicine Research
出版年份 2023 全文链接
标题
Up front and open, shrouded in secrecy, or somewhere in between? A Meta Research Systematic Review of Open Science Practices in Sport Medicine Research
作者
关键词
-
出版物
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages 1-32
出版商
Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy (JOSPT)
发表日期
2023-10-20
DOI
10.2519/jospt.2023.12016
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Implementing clinical trial data sharing requires training a new generation of biomedical researchers
- (2023) Ulrich Mansmann et al. NATURE MEDICINE
- Community consensus on core open science practices to monitor in biomedicine
- (2023) Kelly D. Cobey et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- The Trade Secret Taboo: Open Science Methods are Required to Improve Prediction Models in Sports Medicine and Performance
- (2023) Garrett S. Bullock et al. SPORTS MEDICINE
- On the Reproducibility of Power Analyses in Motor Behavior Research
- (2023) Brad McKay et al. Journal of Motor Learning and Development
- Open and transparent sports science research: the role of journals to move the field forward
- (2022) Harrison J. Hansford et al. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY
- Tolerating bad health research: the continuing scandal
- (2022) Stefania Pirosca et al. Trials
- Call for open science in sports medicine
- (2022) Garrett S Bullock et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
- Replication concerns in sports and exercise science: a narrative review of selected methodological issues in the field
- (2022) Cristian Mesquida et al. Royal Society Open Science
- Leveraging Open Science to Accelerate Research
- (2021) Kushal T. Kadakia et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Implementing the 27 PRISMA 2020 Statement items for systematic reviews in the sport and exercise medicine, musculoskeletal rehabilitation and sports science fields: the PERSiST (implementing Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science) guidance
- (2021) Clare L Ardern et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
- Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology
- (2021) Timothy M Errington et al. eLife
- The Relationship Between Baseball Participation and Health: A Systematic Scoping Review
- (2020) Garrett S. Bullock et al. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY
- Moving Sport and Exercise Science Forward: A Call for the Adoption of More Transparent Research Practices
- (2020) Aaron R. Caldwell et al. SPORTS MEDICINE
- An empirical assessment of transparency and reproducibility-related research practices in the social sciences (2014–2017)
- (2020) Tom E. Hardwicke et al. Royal Society Open Science
- Comment on: ‘Moving Sport and Exercise Science Forward: A Call for the Adoption of More Transparent Research Practices’
- (2020) David N. Borg et al. SPORTS MEDICINE
- A synthetic dataset primer for the biobehavioural sciences to promote reproducibility and hypothesis generation
- (2020) Daniel S Quintana eLife
- Training Load and Injury: Part 2—Questionable Research Practices Hijack the Truth and Mislead Well-Intentioned Clinicians
- (2020) Franco M. Impellizzeri et al. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY
- The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity
- (2020) David Moher et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Call to increase statistical collaboration in sports science, sport and exercise medicine and sports physiotherapy
- (2020) Kristin L Sainani et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
- Data sharing and how it can benefit your scientific career
- (2019) Gabriel Popkin NATURE
- “Available upon request”: not good enough for microbiome data!
- (2018) Morgan G. I. Langille et al. Microbiome
- Data availability, reusability, and analytic reproducibility: evaluating the impact of a mandatory open data policy at the journalCognition
- (2018) Tom E. Hardwicke et al. Royal Society Open Science
- Reproducible research practices, transparency, and open access data in the biomedical literature, 2015–2017
- (2018) Joshua D. Wallach et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Advantages of a Truly Open-Access Data-Sharing Model
- (2017) Monica M. Bertagnolli et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- The relationships between golf and health: a scoping review
- (2016) A D Murray et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
- Data Sharing at a Crossroads
- (2016) Frank Rockhold et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature
- (2016) Shareen A. Iqbal et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
- (2016) Mark D. Wilkinson et al. Scientific Data
- Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement
- (2015) Gary S. Collins et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
- (2015) SCIENCE
- JBIʼs Systematic Reviews
- (2014) Zachary Munn et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING
- Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
- (2013) Katherine S. Button et al. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE
- Open science is a research accelerator
- (2011) Michael Woelfle et al. Nature Chemistry
- Care and management of osteoarthritis in adults: summary of NICE guidance
- (2008) Philip G Conaghan et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Meta-analysis of continuous outcomes combining individual patient data and aggregate data
- (2007) Richard D. Riley et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started