4.7 Article

Condensation heat transfer characteristics of flue gas moisture recovery using ceramic membranes

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 680, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2023.121762

关键词

Ceramic membrane condenser; Condensation mechanism; Capillary condensation; Pilot study; Water recovery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of ceramic membrane condenser helps recover moisture from flue gas and reduces white smoke, smog, and resource consumption. This study compares ceramic membranes with different pore sizes and finds that capillary condensation mechanism is more effective in high-temperature flue gas, enhancing heat transfer efficiency and increasing wall temperature at the flue gas outlet. The capillary condensation mechanism also improves condensation depth for water vapor removal. However, nanomembranes are significantly more expensive than micromembranes under the same flue gas conditions.
The use of a ceramic membrane condenser (TMC) can help recover moisture from flue gas, resulting in a reduction in white smoke, smog, and resource conservation. Although several studies have investigated TMC heat and mass transfer and water vapor condensation mechanisms, few have analyzed the effect of membrane area on thermal mass performance. This paper presents a comparative study of ceramic membranes with different pore sizes to address this gap. In this study, the influence of the condensation mechanism along the flow direction on the heat transfer is innovatively analyzed by combining the mass transfer characteristics. The results show that capillary condensation is more pronounced in high-temperature flue gas, which improves heat transfer efficiency and results in a higher wall temperature rise at the flue gas outlet. The capillary condensation mechanism can also increase the condensation depth, facilitating the removal of water vapor. In particular, in the treatment of 10000 m(3)/h flue gas, the maximum water recovery rate of the 0.4 nm pore size ceramic membrane is 26.6 kg/(m(2)center dot h), which is 27.9% higher than that of the 1 mu m pore size ceramic membrane. However, it is important to note that nanomembranes cost 4.62 times more than micro membranes under the same flue gas conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据