4.5 Review

C. elegans as a model organism for human mitochondrial associated disorders

期刊

MITOCHONDRION
卷 30, 期 -, 页码 117-125

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mito.2016.02.003

关键词

Mitochondria; Mitochondrial diseases; Neurodegeneration; C. elegans; In vivo drug screening; Therapy

资金

  1. Strategic Research Funding of the Heinrich Heine University
  2. Start-up Competitive Research Funding of the Medical Faculty of the Heinrich Heine University (Forschungskommission) [43/2013]
  3. German Research Foundation (DFG) [VE663/3-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitochondria are small cytoplasmic organelles whose most important function is to provide the energy required by our cells and organism to live. To maintain an adequate mitochondrial homeostasis cells possess numerous mitochondrial quality controls and protective compensatory pathways, which can be activated to cope with a certain degree of mitochondrial dysfunction. However, when the mitochondrial damage is too severe and these defensive mechanisms are not anymore sufficient to deal with it, pathological signs arise. In the past few decades numerous genetic disorders ascribed to severe mitochondrial defects have been recognized with variable onset and symptomatology ranging from neuroniuscular degeneration to cancer syndromes. Unfortunately, to date, only symptomatic and no curative therapies exist for most of these devastating, life-threatening disorders. Model organisms, and especially the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, with its sequenced and highly conserved genome, and a simple but well-characterized nervous system, have enormously contributed in the past years to gain insight into the pathogenesis and treatment of different diseases. Here, we will summarize some of the advantages offered by the nematode system to model neurodegenerative diseases associated with mitochondrial electron transport chain defects and screen for therapeutic interventions. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. and Mitochondria Research Society. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据