4.2 Article

Extended finite similitude and dimensional analysis for scaling

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MATHEMATICS
卷 143, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10665-023-10296-1

关键词

Dimensional analysis; Finance; Finite similitude; Mechanics; Scaling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The theory of scaling called finite similitude has been extended to other types of governing equations and applied to quantitative-based theories like finance. This paper demonstrates its applicability to the Black-Scholes equation and portfolio performance evaluation.
The theory of scaling called finite similitude does not involve dimensional analysis and is founded on a transport-equation approach that is applicable to all of classical physics. It features a countable infinite number of similitude rules and has recently been extended to other types of governing equations (e.g., differential, variational) by the introduction of a scaling space Omega(beta,) within which all physical quantities are deemed dependent on a single dimensional parameter beta. The theory is presently limited to physical applications but the focus of this paper is its extension to other quantitative-based theories such as finance. This is achieved by connecting it to an extended form of dimensional analysis, where changes in any quantity can be associated with curves projected onto a dimensional Lie group. It is shown in the paper how differential similitude identities arising out of the finite similitude theory are universal in the sense they can be formed and applied to any quantitative-based theory. In order to illustrate its applicability outside physics the Black-Scholes equation for option valuation in finance is considered since this equation is recognised to be similar in form to an equation from thermal physics. It is demonstrated that the theory of finite similitude can be applied to the Black-Scholes equation and more widely can be used to assess observed size effects in portfolio performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据