4.2 Review

Review: castration - animal welfare considerations

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL RESEARCH
卷 51, 期 1, 页码 703-718

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09712119.2023.2273270

关键词

Castration; cattle; age; breed; castration methods; Burdizzo; surgical; rubber ring; banding; pain mitigation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reviews the impact of castration on cattle welfare, specifically looking at pain and injury, stress, inflammation, immune responses, and production. The review describes different castration methods, the associated pain responses, and how age and pain relief strategies affect these responses. The article also presents research studies that have examined the challenges and biological consequences of castration procedures on cattle welfare.
The castration of male cattle is an integral part of routine farm management. The nature and duration of an animal's response to castration are dependent on a number of factors, including the method employed, the age of animals, the post-castration management, and whether or not pain relief is provided with the procedure. Scientific assessments of the impact of castration on cattle welfare, including pain and injury, stress, inflammation, immune, and production, are the subject of this review. The objectives of this review are to describe (1) the different methods of castration, (2) the pain responses associated with each of those methods, and (3) how age and pain mitigation strategies affect those responses. Research studies are presented that have addressed the challenges imposed by castration procedures on the welfare of cattle based on two main biological events: (1) the changes in biological functions required to cope with the procedure, and (2) the biological consequences to the animals. Indices of animal well-being are described that have objectively demonstrated: (1) the degree of noxiousness that an animal experiences following castration and the success of the coping mechanisms, and (2) the benefit of using pain management in modulating these responses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据