4.7 Article

Thermochemical method for controlling pore structure to enhance hydrogen storage capacity of biochar

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 48, 期 57, 页码 21799-21813

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.03.084

关键词

Biochar; Activation; Pore structure; Hydrogen storage; Isothermal adsorption model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Developing new carbon-based hydrogen storage materials is important for solid-state hydrogen storage technology. Biochar, prepared by KOH melt activation, exhibits high microporosity and hydrogen storage capacity. The hydrogen adsorption process in biochar follows the Langmuir model, with ultramicropores playing a crucial role in hydrogen storage.
Developing new carbon-based hydrogen storage materials can significantly promote solidstate hydrogen storage technology. Biochar with high hydrogen storage capacity can be prepared by KOH melt activation, which has a high proportion of micropores (96.56%) compared with the porous carbon in the existing literature. Its specific surface area and pore volume are 2801.88 m2/g and 1.44 cm3/g, respectively. The size of the nanopores is affected by the activation ratio, but the temperature has little effect at the low activation ratio. SEM results show that the KOH activation process gradually shifts from the biochar's inside to the outside. A low KOH/char ratio (less than 2:1) can promote the formation of small aromatic rings. Due to its high specific surface area and microporosity, the absolute adsorption capacity of hydrogen in biochar is 2.53 wt% at -196 & DEG;C and 1 bar, rising to 5.32 wt% at 50 bar. The hydrogen adsorption process conforms to the Langmuir model. Microporous, mesoporous, and macroporous exhibit different hydrogen adsorption characteristics in various pressure ranges. However, ultramicroporous (<0.7 nm) always plays a decisive role in the hydrogen storage of biochar. & COPY; 2023 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据