4.7 Article

Magnetic dispersive micro solid-phase extraction for trace mercury pre-concentration and determination in water, hemodialysis solution and fish samples

期刊

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 127, 期 -, 页码 170-177

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2016.03.005

关键词

Magnetic dispersive micro solid phase extraction; Mercury; Chelating agent; Cold vapour atomic absorption spectroscopy

资金

  1. Payame Noor University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new preconcentration method, magnetic dispersive micro solid phase extraction (MDMSPE) developed for separation and determination of mercury. In this technique, an appropriate mixture of extraction solvent, disperser solvent and nanomagnetite (Fe3O4)/chelating agent 1-(2-ethoxyphenyl)-3-(4-ethoxyphenyl) triazene functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes with silica shell, as an adsorbent injected rapidly into an aqueous solution containing mercury. After the proper contact time, the nano-adsorbent separated from the aqueous phase by applying magnetic field outside of the vial and transferred to another vial with the elution solvent. The residual solution determined by cold vapour atomic absorption spectroscopy. The main factors affected the preconcentration of mercury investigated and optimized, such as extraction and disperser solvent type, adsorbed amount, sample pH value, effluent concentration, extraction time, the volume of chelating agents and temperature. The adsorption equilibrium data obeyed the Langmuir isotherm models and the kinetic data were well suited to the pseudo-second-order model. Thermodynamic studies revealed the endothermic nature of the procedure. Under the optimum experimental conditions, the detection limit for Hg(II) found to be 1.5 +/- 0.27 ng and its limit of quantification (LOQ) was 5.0 +/- 0.32 ng mL(-1) (n = 5). The linear range of the calibration curve was 9 +/- 0.51-1000 +/- 0.03 ng mL(-1) with a correlation coefficient of 0.9994. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据