4.7 Article

Lead isotopes and elemental composition of Roman fistulae plumbeae aquariae from Conimbriga (Portugal) using Quadrupole ICP-MS

期刊

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 129, 期 -, 页码 184-193

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2016.06.027

关键词

Hydraulic systems; Lusitania; Metallurgical process; Provenances; ICP-MS

资金

  1. Portuguese Science Foundation (FCT) through the project Early Metallurgy in the Portuguese Territory [PTDC/HIS-ARQ/110442/2008]
  2. FCT [UID/Multi/04349/2013, SFRH/BD/88002/2012]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/88002/2012] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lead metal and lead artefacts were widespread over the Roman world, as consequence of its large use in public buildings, namely as plumbing on hydraulic systems of Roman cities and villae. The determination of Pb isotope ratios combined with minor and trace element contents of such lead artefacts may constitute a powerful tool for provenance studies as well as in the assessment of trade routes during the Roman period. In the present work forty four fistutae plumbeae from the hydraulic systems installed at Conimbriga were analysed using a quadrupole based ICP-MS. The overall results demonstrate the suitableness of this well-established and economic analytical technique involving simple sample preparation and high throughput Pb isotopic patterns present high scattered distributions which suggest different provenances of the raw material. Ag, As, Bi, Cu, Ni, Sb, and Sn contents were determined in an attempt to identify the type of raw materials and the metallurgical process used to obtain the lead metal. Sn content points to the frequent use of recycled lead. The Pb isotope ratios of samples of lead pipes made with metal probably not recycled indicate the use of raw materials (galena ores) from Sierra Morena mines or desilvered litharge resulting from silver cupellation probably using argentiferous jarosite ores from the Iberian Pyrite Belt (Rio Tinto mines). (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据