4.7 Article

In vitro and in vivo antibiofilm potential of 2,4-Di-tert-butylphenol from seaweed surface associated bacterium Bacillus subtilis against group A streptococcus

期刊

MICROBIOLOGICAL RESEARCH
卷 191, 期 -, 页码 19-31

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.micres.2016.05.010

关键词

2,4-Di-tert-butyl-phenol; Biofilm; GAS; Hydrophobicity; Hyaluronic acid

资金

  1. Department of Biotechnology, Government of India [BT/BI/25/012/2012 (BIF)]
  2. University Grants Commission, New Delhi through SAP-DRS1 [F.3-28/2011(SAP-II)]
  3. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India through PURSE [SR/S9Z-23/2010/42(G)]
  4. FIST [SR-FST/LSI-087/2008]
  5. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi [09/688(0017)/2011-EMR-I]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biofilm formation of Group A Streptococcus (GAS) is recognized as an important virulent determinant. The present study reports the antibiofilm potential of seaweed (Gracilaria gracilis) surface associated Bacillus subtilis against GAS. Purification revealed 2,4-Di-tert-butyl-phenol (DTBP) as the active principle. DTBP exhibited a dose dependent antibiofilm activity against GAS (SF370 & six different clinical M serotypes). Microscopic analysis, revealed changes in cell surface architecture and reduced thickness upon DTBP treatment. Results of extracellular polymeric substance quantification, microbial adhesion to hydrocarbon assay and fourier transform infrared spectroscopic analysis suggested that DTBP probably interferes with the initial adhesion stage of biofilm formation cascade. Reduction in hyaluronic acid synthesis goes in unison with blood survival assay wherein, increased susceptibility to phagocytosis was observed. In vivo studies using Caenorhabditis elegans manifested the reduction in adherence and virulence, which prompts further investigation of the potential of DTBP for the treatment of GAS infections. (C) 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据