4.1 Review

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: an overview with focus on its prevention and management

出版社

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s42000-023-00491-1

关键词

Bone mineral density; Fracture; Glucocorticoid; Oral; Osteoporosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The widespread use of glucocorticoids has both benefits and drawbacks, with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis being a common concern. Various scientific societies have provided guidelines on the management of patients receiving glucocorticoid therapy, focusing on preventive measures and appropriate treatment timing. Oral bisphosphonates are typically recommended as first-line treatment, while osteoanabolic therapies are considered more suitable. The correct risk stratification and timely intervention by treating physicians are crucial.
The widespread use of glucocorticoids (GCs) contributes to the effective management of several diseases and conditions. However, it comes at a price in the case of the bones causing glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP), the most common cause of secondary osteoporosis and fractures. Several scientific societies have issued comprehensive guidelines on the optimal management of patients receiving GCs with the aim of providing answers to three fundamental questions, namely, whom to treat, when to treat, and how to treat. Both common ground and different approaches exist among them. General preventive measures should start along with GC initiation, and the duration of GC therapy should be limited to the minimal effective range. A pre-existing fracture, age, gender, menopausal status, dose, and duration of GC treatment are key factors in the decision to initiate antiosteoporotic medication. Oral bisphosphonates are typically regarded as the first-line treatment choice for GIOP partly due to their cost-effectiveness. Denosumab is another valid option, but an exit strategy should be considered before its initiation due to the risk of rebound-associated vertebral fractures upon its discontinuation. Since impaired bone formation represents the main mechanism by which GCs negatively affect skeletal health, osteoanabolic therapies appear to be pathophysiologically the more appropriate and appealing option, although cost considerations currently limit their use to selected severe cases. Regardless of the agent selected to mitigate the impact of GCs on the skeleton, what is most crucial is that the treating physician correctly stratifies the risk and intervenes at the right time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据