4.5 Article

Investigation on dynamic performance of soilbag cushion using shaking table tests

期刊

GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1680/jgein.23.00074

关键词

Geosynthetics; Shaking table test; Soilbags; Acceleration; Dynamic lateral earth pressure; Settlement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soilbag cushion is a promising base isolation method that can effectively reduce seismic energy transfer and improve the dynamic performance of building structures. Under high-acceleration, high-frequency, or high uniformly distributed load conditions, the advantages of soilbag cushion for energy dissipation and damping are more easily highlighted. The dynamic performance of soilbag cushion depends on the embedded depth and thickness.
Soilbag cushion is one of the promising base isolation methods to reduce seismic energy transfer from ground to building structure. In this study, a series of shaking table tests were conducted comparatively on foundation models with soilbag cushion and sand cushion to evaluate their dynamic performance. The test results indicate that soilbag cushion could significantly reduce acceleration response and accumulated settlement compared to sand cushion. And the relatively smaller amplitude of dynamic lateral earth pressure measured on contact surface of soilbags within soilbag cushion also indicates its stability during oscillation. The advantages of soilbag cushion for energy dissipation and damping are more easily highlighted under the condition of high-acceleration, high-frequency or high uniformly distributed load. The dynamic performance of soilbag cushion is dependent on embedded depth and thickness. It is most effective for soilbag cushion to be arranged near the rigid footing of building structures; it is suggested that the number of layers of soilbag cushion be controlled on the premise of the designed ratio of the thickness to the width of soilbag cushion ranging from 0.125 to 0.4 for low- or middle-rise masonry buildings in practical engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据