4.5 Article

Modular polymer stormwater collection structure response to one-week design-truck load

期刊

GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1680/jgein.23.00095

关键词

Geosynthetics; Soil-structure interaction; Buried polymer structure; Physical modelling; Creep

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Full-scale physical modeling was used to study the response of modular polymer stormwater collection structures under vehicle loading and buried conditions. The results showed that the buried system had good stability and high resistance. Compared to isolated structures, the buried system had less severe response, with no increase in column loads over time and smaller increases in bending deflections.
Full-scale physical modelling was used to evaluate the response of modular polymer stormwater collection structures when subjected to design-truck loading that was sustained for 1 week (i.e. a parked vehicle) and when buried with minimum soil cover. Surface loading was applied on a steel load pad that simulates one-half of the AASHTO design-truck single-axle that was held constant for 1 week to assess the stability of the buried system and demand on the platen and column components of the modules to allow independent load rating of the buried structure. No collapse or limiting state occurred. The 1-week creep buckling resistance was found to be nearly four times the factored column demand to 1-week loading for both module types. New insight into the time-dependent behaviour of the soil-structure system was gained by comparing the buried response to creep tests conducted on isolated columns and platens. The response of the buried soil-structure system was less severe than unconstrained creep. Column loads were found to not increase with time. Bending deflections increased by 1.04 to 1.26 times when buried rather than by 3.0 to 3.4 times for unconstrained creep as platen creep when buried was greatly restrained by the soil.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据