4.1 Article

Translation of paired box 6 (PAX6) mRNA is IRES-mediated and inhibited by cymarin in breast cancer cells

期刊

GENES & GENETIC SYSTEMS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

GENETICS SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.1266/ggs.23-00039

关键词

paired box 6; internal ribosome entry site; 5 '-untranslated region; translation initiation; cymarin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The translation level of PAX6 in breast cancer cells is influenced by chemotherapeutic drug and cardiac glycosides. The 5’-UTR of PAX6 mRNA contains an IRES element with core IRES activity between nucleotides 159 and 333. Cymarin, a cardiac glycoside, inhibits the expression of PAX6 protein and suppresses the proliferation of breast cancer cells.
Paired box 6 (PAX6) is a member of the PAX family and plays an essential role in cancer cell cycle progression, colony formation, proliferation and invasion. Its expression is upregulated in many cancers including breast cancer, but the process of PAX6 mRNA translation has rarely been studied. We found that PAX6 translation level increased in MCF-7 breast cancer cells treated with the chemotherapeutic drug adriamycin (ADM), which might be attributable to internal ribosome entry site (IRES)-mediated translation. By modifying a bicistronic luciferase plasmid that is widely used to examine IRES activity, we found that the 469-base 5 '-UTR of PAX6 mRNA contains an IRES element and that core IRES activity is located between nucleotides 159 and 333. Moreover, PAX6 IRES activity was induced during ADM treatment, which may be the main reason for the elevated level of PAX6 protein. We also found that cymarin, a cardiac glycoside, acts as an inhibitor of PAX6 protein expression by impairing its IRES-mediated translation. Furthermore, MCF-7 cell proliferation was suppressed during treatment with cymarin. These results provide novel insights into the translation mechanism of PAX6 in breast cancer cells and suggest that cymarin is a promising candidate for the treatment of breast cancer via targeting the expression of PAX6.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据