4.3 Review

Esophageal Motility Disorders: Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies

期刊

DIGESTION
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000533347

关键词

Esophageal motility disorders; Esophageal achalasia; Gastroesophageal reflux disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Esophageal motility disorders are characterized by impaired relaxation of the esophageal sphincter and defective peristaltic contractions, leading to dysphagia and noncardiac chest pain. While high-resolution manometry is the gold standard for diagnosis, endoscopy and barium swallow can also provide characteristic findings in some cases. Proper diagnosis and evaluation are crucial before considering invasive treatments.
Background: Esophageal motility disorders (EMDs) are caused by the impaired relaxation of the upper/lower esophageal sphincter and/or defective esophageal peristaltic contractions, resulting in dysphagia and noncardiac chest pain. High-resolution manometry (HRM) is essential for the diagnosis of primary EMD; however, the recognition of EMD and HRM by general practitioners in Japan is limited. This review summarizes the diagnosis of and treatment strategies for EMD. Summary: HRM is a specific test for the diagnosis of EMD, whereas endoscopy and barium swallow as screening tests provide characteristic findings (i.e., esophageal rosette and bird's beak sign) in some cases. It is important to note that manometric diagnoses apart from achalasia are often clinically irrelevant; therefore, the recently updated guidelines suggest additional manometric maneuvers, such as the rapid drink challenge, and further testing, including functional lumen imaging, for a more accurate diagnosis before invasive treatment. Endoscopic/surgical myotomy, pneumatic dilation, and botulinum toxin injections need to be considered for patients with achalasia and clinically relevant esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Key Message: Since the detailed pathophysiology of EMD remains unclear, their diagnosis needs to be cautiously established prior to the initiation of invasive treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据