4.0 Review

Shared Decision-Making and Family Meetings in Neurocritical Care

期刊

出版社

CURRENT MEDICINE GROUP
DOI: 10.1007/s11940-023-00765-4

关键词

Shared decision-making; Prognostication; Family-centered care; Neurocritical care; Severe acute brain injury; Acute ischemic stroke; Intracerebral hemorrhage; Traumatic brain injury

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review examines the role of shared decision-making in neurocritical care units and discusses interventions that can improve the involvement of patients' surrogates. Findings suggest that surrogates of critically ill patients wish to be more involved in decision-making, and several interventions including information leaflets, family support interventions, and decision aids have been developed and tested in ICUs. Future research will evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of these interventions in neuroICUs.
Purpose of ReviewShared decision-making (SDM) can enhance communication between healthcare providers and families in neurocritical care units (neuroICUs). This review summarizes the current state of SDM and family meetings in neuroICUs and discusses interventions that can improve the involvement of patients' surrogates in the decision-making process.Recent FindingsSurrogates of critically ill patients often wish to be more involved in decision-making. Several interventions, including information leaflets, family support interventions, and decision aids, have been developed and tested in ICUs, with some tailored to patients and surrogates in neuroICUs. Ongoing research will determine whether these tools improve patient-centered and patient-goal-concordant care. Future studies will need to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of these interventions in neuroICUs. Web-based decision aids are likely to improve portability and accessibility.SummaryDespite some challenges, these interventions show promise in enhancing patient-centered care and supporting the involvement of families in neuroICUs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据