4.2 Article

Investigation of the behavior of plasma jet in the presence of water under different grounded conditions

期刊

CONTRIBUTIONS TO PLASMA PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ctpp.202300080

关键词

discharge mode; electric diagram; electrode length

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the characteristics of plasma jets underwater for different grounded conditions. It is found that when water is grounded, more ions are transferred to the water, enhancing the discharge intensity and electrode length. Additionally, the shorter the electrode length, the larger the ratio of plasma jet length to electrode length. An electric diagram is used to explain the corresponding mechanism, and the accumulation of charges in water is identified as the main reason for influencing the propagation of plasma jet underwater.
Previous researches have demonstrated that the ground electrode would influence the performance of the plasma jet. In this study, the characteristics of plasma jets underwater for different grounded conditions are investigated. The influence of airflow rate, and electrode length underwater are experimental studies. When the water is grounded, it would provide another charge channel for the discharge, much more ions would be transferred to the water. The length and discharge intensity would be enhanced. Besides, the length of electrode underwater would also influence the performance of the plasma jet. It is found that the shorter the electrode length, the larger the ratio of plasma jet length to electrode length. Furthermore, an electric diagram is promoted to explain the corresponding mechanism, by analyzing the resistance and capacitance under different working conditions, the theoretical explanation under different experimental working conditions is given, and further analysis demonstrated that the accumulation of charges in water during the discharge process would be the main reason to influence the propagation of plasma jet under water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据