4.4 Article

Deforestation Impacts on Diversity of Orchids with Inference on the Conservation Initiatives: Malaysia Case Study

期刊

BOTANICAL REVIEW
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12229-023-09292-y

关键词

Orchid; Primary forest; Logging; Diversity and abundance; Ecology; Host plant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Monitoring the impact of anthropogenic and naturogenic threats on orchid community through diversity, taxonomy and conservation studies is necessary. Reintroduction of these species to their natural habitat associates with their resilience, selection of suitable trees and sites for regeneration and restoration efforts, drives the conservation initiative. To accurately estimate genetic diversity for conservation purposes, it is crucial to utilize integrative methods of classical morphological taxonomy, anatomy (micromorphology), and molecular genetics to address taxonomic uncertainty.
Monitoring the impact of anthropogenic and naturogenic threats on orchid community through diversity, taxonomy and conservation studies is necessary. Reintroduction of these species to their natural habitat associates with their resilience, selection of suitable trees and sites for regeneration and restoration efforts, drives the conservation initiative. Upon obtaining an accurate estimate of the diversity for genetic resource conservation, integrative methods of classical morphological taxonomy, anatomy (micromorphology), and molecular genetics are crucial to solve the taxonomic uncertainty. Changes in microclimatic conditions and habitat structures are the key determinants of both epiphytic and terrestrial orchids assemblages following disturbance. Any assessments of biodiversity and ecosystem service must include variable forest types and management regimes to provide impartial views on the effect of forest and ecological disturbance on the orchid community. Accordingly, a plant-microbial ecology study should be included to study the extent of human-induced climatic variability towards the orchid diversification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据