Mitigating Infection Risk in Upper Airway Stimulation

Objective: This study aims to define the incidence of infection with upper airway stimulation (UAS) devices requiring explantation in a single academic center and identify factors that may influence the risk of infection. Methods: A database of patients who underwent UAS at a single tertiary referral academic center from 2017 to 2021 was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who developed surgical site infections, with and without subsequent explantation. Additional data for cases complicated by infection was extracted from the electronic medical record (EMR) and included: demographic information, medical history, complications and management, and overall outcomes. In March 2021, 2 modifications to infection control protocols were implemented: double skin preparation with Betadine and chlorhexidine, and MRSA decolonization. Statistical analysis was performed to compare infectious risk before and after these protocol changes. Results: In the study period, 215 patients underwent UAS in the specified time period and 3 cases (1.4%) of postoperative infections were identified, all of which required explantation. The infection rate did not significantly change after modifications to the surgical prep protocol (P = .52). Conclusions: While no significant difference in infection risk was noted after modifying infection control protocols, additional longer-term study is warranted to elucidate effective infection reduction strategies.

Automated summary

This study aims to define the incidence of infection with UAS devices requiring explantation and identify factors that may influence the risk of infection. The results showed no significant difference in infection risk after modifications to the infection control protocols.