4.2 Review

Genotype and phenotype characterization of primary hypertrophic osteoarthropathy type 2 and chronic enteropathy associated with SLCO2A1: Report of two cases and literature review

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.63446

关键词

chronic enteropathy associated with; pachydermoperiostosis; primary hypertrophic osteoarthropathy type 2; SLCO2A1; Touraine-Solente-Gol & eacute; syndrome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports two cases of PHOAR2 with concomitant CEAS in Mexico and analyzes the relationship between their genotype and phenotype presentation through a literature review. The study finds a significant association between different variants in SLCO2A1 and the development of CEAS.
Autosomal recessive type 2 primary hypertrophic osteoarthropathy (PHOAR2) and chronic enteropathy associated with SLCO2A1 (CEAS) are two entities caused by pathogenic variants (PVs) in the SLCO2A1 gene that can coexist or occur independently from one another. We report two cases of PHOAR2 in Mexico with concomitant CEAS and conducted a review of the literature of the reported cases of PHOAR2 and/or CEAS to analyze the relationship between their genotype and phenotype presentation. The patients from our Institution with classical PHOAR2 phenotype and CEAS, harbored SLCO2A1 c.547G > A and c.1768del variants. We reviewed 232 cases, of which 86.6% were of Asian origin, and identified 109 different variants in SLCO2A1. Intron 7, exon 13, and exon 4 were predominantly affected. The two most common PVs were c.940 + 1G > A and c.1807C > T. We found a statistically significant association between SLCO2A1 variants located in intron 7, exons 12, and 13 and the development of CEAS. Missense variants were more frequent in isolated PHOAR2, while a greater proportion of protein-truncating variants (PTVs) were found in CEAS. Further investigation is imperative to elucidate the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms associated with CEAS, thereby facilitating the identification of effective therapeutic interventions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据