4.7 Article

Temperature damage and constitutive model of frozen soil under dynamic loading

期刊

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS
卷 102, 期 -, 页码 108-116

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2016.08.009

关键词

Frozen soil; Temperature damage; Dynamic test; SHPB; Constitutive model

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11172251, 11672253]
  2. Project of Sichuan Provincial Youth Science and Technology Innovation Team, China [2013TD0004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Temperature damage of frozen soil, which is a unique type of dynamic damage, is caused by weakened bonds between ice and soil particles due to a rise in the temperature under dynamic loading. In this paper, on the basis of the physical and mechanical properties of frozen soil, relationships between temperature and strain under dynamic loading are deduced and simplified into a form corresponding to the dynamic behavior of frozen soil. An analysis of the relationship between temperature damage and the dynamic behavior of frozen soil reveals that the significant parameters influencing temperature damage are strain rate and effective ice content. Strain rate is obtained by direct measurement, and effective ice content is a major parameter in establishing the dynamic strength theory of frozen soil. The relationship between effective ice content and temperature rise is established by calculating the unfrozen water content. Using the inherent relationship between effective ice content and elastic modulus, a function of the equivalent modulus, which describes the effect of transient temperature rise on the dynamic behavior of frozen soil, is established. From dynamic loading experiments conducted using the split Hopkinson pressure bar method and the theoretical results, the stress-strain curves of frozen soil under different conditions of dynamic loading are obtained. The theoretical analysis is validated by the good agreement between the theoretical results and the experimental ones. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据