4.1 Article

Mapping fine-scale demersal trawl effort for application in ecosystem assessment and spatial planning

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.2989/1814232X.2023.2241885

关键词

benthic ecosystems; eco-certification; fishing activity; South Africa; spatial prioritisation; swept area ratio; trawling intensity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of an accurate map of demersal trawling intensity in South Africa is valuable for fisheries management, ecosystem assessments, and marine spatial planning. The map can be used to identify core fishing areas and prioritize management and protection of marine ecosystem types.
Fine-scale maps of fishing activity are valuable information layers for fisheries management, assessments of biodiversity impacts and marine spatial planning. Our aim was to develop an accurate map of demersal trawling intensity in South Africa and to demonstrate its utility at a national scale. We calculated a swept area ratio, representing demersal trawling effort for the entire study period (2005-2018) and annually. We then plotted spatial and temporal patterns of trawling activity, identified core fishing areas, and examined spatial overlap between trawling, South Africa's marine ecosystem types and the national network of marine protected areas. A high proportion of trawling effort (90%) was concentrated in 43% of the area exposed to trawling, with the remaining 10% spread across 57% of the fished areas. The fishery overlaps with 33 of 150 benthic and bentho-pelagic marine ecosystem types. Of those, 11 have more than 50% of their extent, and five have more than 80%, within the trawl ring-fence. Our analyses support a systematic prioritisation of ecosystem types for further management and protection. The new South African trawling-intensity map contributes an improved pressure layer for ecosystem assessments, can help identify priority fishing areas and has application in conservation, marine spatial planning and fisheries management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据