4.7 Article

Data-driven mono-component feature identification via modified nonlocal means and MEWT for mechanical drivetrain fault diagnosis

期刊

MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING
卷 80, 期 -, 页码 533-552

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.05.013

关键词

Fault diagnosis; Nonlocal means; Data-driven Fourier spectrum segment; Empirical wavelet transform

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China for Innovation Research Group [51421004]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51405379, 51405301]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M562396, 2015T81017]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [XJJ2015106, CXTD2014001]
  5. Shaanxi Industrial Science and Technology Project [2015GY121]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is significant to perform condition monitoring and fault diagnosis on rolling mills in steel-making plant to ensure economic benefit. However, timely fault identification of key parts in a complicated industrial system under operating condition is still a challenging task since acquired condition signals are usually multi-modulated and inevitably mixed with strong noise. Therefore, a new data-driven mono-component identification method is proposed in this paper for diagnostic purpose. First, the modified nonlocal means algorithm (NLmeans) is proposed to reduce noise in vibration signals without destroying its original Fourier spectrum structure. During the modified NLmeans, two modifications are investigated and performed to improve denoising effect. Then, the modified empirical wavelet transform (MEWT) is applied on the de-noised signal to adaptively extract empirical mono-component modes. Finally, the modes are analyzed for mechanical fault identification based on Hilbert transform. The results show that the proposed data-driven method owns superior performance during system operation compared with the MEWT method. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据