4.0 Article

Hydrophobic modification of cellulose from oil palm empty fruit bunch: Characterization and application in Pickering emulsions stabilization

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.carpta.2023.100282

关键词

Oil palm empty fruit bunch; Cellulose; Benzoyl chloride; Pickering emulsion; Aqueous medium; Stability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the isolation and hydrophobic modification of cellulose from oil palm empty fruit bunch (OPEFB) and its potential as a Pickering emulsion stabilizer. It was found that OPEFB is a valuable source of hemicellulose and cellulose. The modified cellulose derivatives showed improved properties, and the Pickering emulsions stabilized by these derivatives exhibited resistance to coalescence, making them suitable for various applications.
Isolation and hydrophobic modification of cellulose from oil palm empty fruit bunch (OPEFB) and its capacity to act as Pickering emulsion stabilizer was studied. The isolated cellulose was hydrophobically functionalized with acid chloride (benzoyl chloride) in aqueous medium. Proximate analysis indicated that oil palm empty fruit bunch is a valuable source of hemicellulose and cellulose. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) revealed crystallinity index (CrI) of isolated cellulose (CB) and benzoylated cellulose (MCB) to be 66.12% and 61.38% respectively. Both Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and Differential Thermogravimetric (DTG) showed that thermal stability of MCB is higher than CB. The aqueous modification method would mitigate problems of environmental chal-lenges often encountered in non-aqueous methods of cellulose modification. Pickering emulsions stabilized by the benzoylated cellulose (MCB) derivatives are stable, more importantly at higher particles concentrations. The improved properties of modified cellulose (MCB) derivatives recorded in this study and resistance of Pickering emulsions to coalescence showed that MCB is a potential material for formulation of food, drug delivery and pharmaceuticals products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据