4.4 Article

Infant feeding practices in a South African birth cohortA longitudinal study

期刊

MATERNAL AND CHILD NUTRITION
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12371

关键词

birth cohort; breastfeeding duration; child feeding; complementary feeding; infant growth; low-income countries

资金

  1. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP 1017641]
  2. South African Medical Research Council
  3. GlaxoSmithKline (GSK)/South African Thoracic Society
  4. Harry Crossley Foundation
  5. Discovery Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Childhood malnutrition is highly prevalent in low- and middle-income countries. The choices of complementary foods, which are important in infant nutrition, are poorly described in this setting. We investigated infant feeding practices in a South African birth cohort, the Drakenstein Child Health Study. Longitudinal feeding data were collected from March 2012 to March 2015. Feeding practices at birth, 6-10 and 14weeks and 6, 9, and 12months, were investigated using food frequency questionnaires. Anthropometry was measured at birth and 12months. The quality of the diet was analyzed using the World Health Organization infant and young child feeding indicators. Regression models were used to explore associations between feeding and growth outcomes at 1year. Exclusive breastfeeding for 6months was low (13%), and 19% of infants were introduced to solid foods before 4months. There was high daily consumption of processed meat (56%) and inappropriate foods such as fruit juice (82%), soft drinks (54%), and refined sugary foods (51%) at 1year. Dietary diversity and consumption of iron rich foods were low at 6months (5% and 3%, respectively) but higher by 12months (75% and 78%). Longer duration of exclusive breastfeeding was associated with a lower height-for-age z-score at 1year. Several dietary deficits and a rising trend in the consumption of inappropriate nutritionally poor foods were identified. These findings raise concern about poor dietary practices and the impact on child and long-term health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据