4.7 Article

Diffraction and single-crystal elastic constants of Inconel 625 at room and elevated temperatures determined by neutron diffraction

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.08.010

关键词

Diffraction elastic constants; Single-crystal elastic constants; Inconel 625; Neutron diffraction; Superalloys; Additive manufacturing

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI-1402978]
  2. Oak Ridge Associated Universities Ralph E. Powe Junior Faculty Enhancement Award
  3. Scientific User Facilities Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  5. Directorate For Engineering [1402978] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, diffraction and single-crystal elastic constants of Inconel 625 have been determined by means of in situ loading at room and elevated temperatures using time-of-flight neutron diffraction. Theoretical models proposed by Voigt, Reuss, and Kroner were used to determine single-crystal elastic constants from measured diffraction elastic constants, with the Kroner model having the best ability to capture experimental data. The magnitude of single-crystal elastic moduli, computed from single-crystal elastic constants, decreases and the single crystal anisotropy increases as temperature increases, indicating the importance of texture in affecting macroscopic stress at elevated temperatures. The experimental data reported here are of great importance in understanding additive manufacturing of metallic components as: diffraction elastic constants are required for computing residual stresses from residual lattice strains measured using neutron diffraction, which can be used to validate thermomechanical models of additive manufacturing, while single-crystal elastic constants can be used in crystal plasticity modeling, for example, to understand mechanical deformation behavior of additively manufactured components. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据