4.7 Article

The effect of strain distribution on microstructural developments during forging in a newly developed nickel base superalloy

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.12.042

关键词

Nickel-based superalloy; Forging; Recrystallization; Microstructure; EBSD

资金

  1. EPSRC Rolls-Royce Strategic Partnership in Structural Metallic Systems for Gas Turbines [EP/H500383/1, EP/H022309/1]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/M005607/1, EP/H500383/1, 1221966] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. EPSRC [EP/M005607/1, EP/H500383/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the current study, the effect of strain distribution in a simple forging geometry on the propensity for recrystallization, and its impact on mechanical properties has been investigated in a newly developed experimental nickel-based superalloy. The new alloy was produced via a Powder Metallurgy (PM) route and was subsequently Hot Isostatic Processed (HIP), isothermally forged, and heat treated to produce a coarse grain microstructure with average grain size of 23-32 mu m. The alloy was examined by means of Electron Back-Scatter Diffraction (EBSD) to characterise the microstructural features such as grain orientation and morphology, grain boundary characteristics and the identification of potential Prior Particle Boundaries (PPBs) throughout each stage of the processing route. Results at the central region of the cross-section plane parallel to the loading direction showed significant microstructural differences across the forging depth. This microstructural variation was found to be highly dependent on the value of local strain imparted during forging such that areas of low effective strain showed partial recrystallisation and a necklace grain structure was observed following heat treatment. Meanwhile, a fully recrystallised microstructure with no PPBs was observed in the areas of high strain values, in the central region of the forging. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据