4.6 Article

Effect of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on the performance of styrene-butadiene-styrene copolymer modified asphalt

期刊

MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES
卷 50, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1617/s11527-016-0890-9

关键词

Asphalt; Multi-walled carbon nanotubes; Polymer; Rheological properties; Micro-morphologies

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51278159, 51478154, 51278188]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The performance of styrene-butadiene-styrene block copolymers modified asphalt (SBS PMA) is heavily degraded in pavement engineering due to the weak interphase and the aging of SBS. In this paper, a type of functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes (CNTs) with hydroxyl groups was selected to address the two problems. Brookfield viscometer, dynamic shear rheology, bending beam rheometer, atomic force microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy were used to capture the performance and micro-morphologies of asphalt samples. Results of the performance investigation showed that CNTs decreased the viscosity (100-135 degrees C) of SBS PMA, performing a better workability. CNTs acted as a barrier to reduce oxygen-uptake amount of SBS, providing a better anti-aging property. The anti-rutting and fatigue resistance of SBS PMA were enhanced by adding a suitable amount of CNTs. All the binders with CNTs had similar stiffness, but that difference between them and the SBS PMA was higher at temperatures above -24 degrees C. Therefore, CNTs do not affect the anti-cracking property of SBS PMA. Results of morphologies analyses showed that CNTs enriched the interphase of SBS PMA not matrix. The reinforced phase (SBS-phase) of the binder with suitable amount of CNTs performed uniform distribution, and an interlocked structure. A significantly pull-out behavior of CNTs reinforced the interface, formed a dense network, and changed the behaviors of molecular motion in asphalt. Thus, functionalized CNTs with finer dispersion in the matrix provided SBS PMA with better mechanical properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据