4.7 Article

Effect of Experimental Parameters on Alginate/Chitosan Microparticles for BCG Encapsulation

期刊

MARINE DRUGS
卷 14, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/md14050090

关键词

alginate; chitosan; BCG; microencapsulation; biocompatibility

资金

  1. iMed.ULisboa from Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal [UID/DTP/04138/2013]
  2. Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saude de Lisboa - Caixa Geral de Depositos, Portugal [ESTeSL-IPL/CGD/2012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the present study was to develop novel Mycobacterium bovis bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG)-loaded polymeric microparticles with optimized particle surface characteristics and biocompatibility, so that whole live attenuated bacteria could be further used for pre-exposure vaccination against Mycobacterium tuberculosis by the intranasal route. BCG was encapsulated in chitosan and alginate microparticles through three different polyionic complexation methods by high speed stirring. For comparison purposes, similar formulations were prepared with high shear homogenization and sonication. Additional optimization studies were conducted with polymers of different quality specifications in a wide range of pH values, and with three different cryoprotectors. Particle morphology, size distribution, encapsulation efficiency, surface charge, physicochemical properties and biocompatibility were assessed. Particles exhibited a micrometer size and a spherical morphology. Chitosan addition to BCG shifted the bacilli surface charge from negative zeta potential values to strongly positive ones. Chitosan of low molecular weight produced particle suspensions of lower size distribution and higher stability, allowing efficient BCG encapsulation and biocompatibility. Particle formulation consistency was improved when the availability of functional groups from alginate and chitosan was close to stoichiometric proportion. Thus, the herein described microparticulate system constitutes a promising strategy to deliver BCG vaccine by the intranasal route.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据