4.2 Article

Reproducible segmentation of white matter hyperintensities using a new statistical definition

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10334-016-0599-3

关键词

Segmentation; White matter hyperintensities; White matter lesion; Multimodal segmentation

资金

  1. Gun and Bertil Stohnes foundation
  2. Swedish Society for Medical Research (SSMF)
  3. Stockholm County Council
  4. Swedish Brain Power
  5. Strategic Research Programme in Neuroscience at Karolinska Institutet (StratNeuro)
  6. Swedish Alzheimer Foundation (Alzheimerfonden)
  7. Gamla Tjanarinnor foundation
  8. Karolinska Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives We present a method based on a proposed statistical definition of white matter hyperintensities (WMH), which can work with any combination of conventional magnetic resonance (MR) sequences without depending on manually delineated samples. Materials and methods T1-weighted, T2-weighted, FLAIR, and PD sequences acquired at 1.5 Tesla from 119 subjects from the Kings Health Partners-Dementia Case Register (healthy controls, mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease) were used. The segmentation was performed using a proposed definition for WMH based on the one-tailed Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Results The presented method was verified, given all possible combinations of input sequences, against manual segmentations and a high similarity (Dice 0.85-0.91) was observed. Comparing segmentations with different input sequences to one another also yielded a high similarity (Dice 0.83-0.94) that exceeded intra-rater similarity (Dice 0.75-0.91). We compared the results with those of other available methods and showed that the segmentation based on the proposed definition has better accuracy and reproducibility in the test dataset used. Conclusion Overall, the presented definition is shown to produce accurate results with higher reproducibility than manual delineation. This approach can be an alternative to other manual or automatic methods not only because of its accuracy, but also due to its good reproducibility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据