4.5 Article

Pulmonary pharmacodynamics of an anti-GM-CSFR antibody enables therapeutic dosing that limits exposure in the lung

期刊

MABS
卷 8, 期 7, 页码 1398-1406

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2016.1215790

关键词

Antibody exposure; GM-CSF; GM-CSF Receptor; lung partitioning; pharmacodynamics; pulmonary alveolar proteinosis; rheumatoid arthritis

资金

  1. MedImmune Ltd

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis is associated with impaired alveolar macrophage differentiation due to genetic defects in the granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) axis or autoantibody blockade of GM-CSF. The anti-GM-CSFR antibody mavrilimumab has shown clinical benefit in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, but with no accompanying pulmonary pathology observed to date. We aimed to model systemic versus pulmonary pharmacodynamics of an anti-GM-CSFR antibody to understand the pharmacology that contributes to this therapeutic margin. Mice were dosed intraperitoneal with anti-GM-CSFR antibody, and pharmacodynamics bioassays for GM-CSFR inhibition performed on blood and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cells to quantify coverage in the circulation and lung, respectively. A single dose of 3mg/kg of the anti-GM-CSFR antibody saturated the systemic cellular pool, but dosing up to 10 times higher had no effect on the responsiveness of BAL cells to GM-CSF. Continued administration of this dose of anti-GM-CSFR antibody for 7 consecutive days also had no inhibitory effect on these cells. Partial inhibition of GM-CSFR function on cells from the BAL was only observed after dosing for 5 or 7 consecutive days at 30mg/kg, 10-fold higher than the proposed therapeutic dose. In conclusion, dosing with anti-GM-CSFR antibody using regimes that saturate circulating cells, and have been shown to be efficacious in inflammatory arthritis models, did not lead to complete blockade of the alveolar macrophages response to GM-CSF. This suggests a significant therapeutic window is possible with GM-CSF axis inhibition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据