4.6 Article

Assessment of sub-200-nm nanobubbles with ultra-high stability in water

期刊

APPLIED WATER SCIENCE
卷 13, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13201-023-01950-1

关键词

Bubble technology; Nanobubbles; Ultra-high stability; High concentration; Sub-200 nm

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bubble technology has been proven to be an efficient method for reducing environmental pollution, strengthening water treatment processes, and increasing production in industrial and agricultural applications. Nanobubbles, particularly those smaller than 200 nm, possess unique properties such as low buoyancy, high mass transfer efficiency, and unexpected stability. This study investigates the number and stability of high-concentration nanobubbles under various conditions, and the results demonstrate their potential for mass production and distribution in bubble technologies.
Bubble technology has proven to be an efficient technique of reducing environmental pollution, strengthening water treatment procedures, and increasing production in industrial and agricultural applications. Compared to large bubbles such as macro- or micro-bubbles, nanobubbles (NBs) in liquids have several intriguing properties, including low buoyancy, high mass transfer efficiency, and high reactivity. In particular, NBs smaller than 200 nm are unexpectedly stable. However, determining the underlying mechanism of the stability of NBs in a solution is difficult. Most studies only focus on the temporal changes in the size and surface charge of NBs; the changes in the concentration of NBs are typically ignored. In this study, we investigate the number and stability of high-concentration NBs under various conditions. The results show that the number and concentration of NBs can be maintained at approximately 80-90% under various conditions, such as aging, temperature, centrifugation, shaking, and stirring. In other words, NBs possess significant potential for use in mass production and distribution in bubble technologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据