4.7 Article

A comparison study of bioaccessibility of soy protein gel induced by magnesiumchloride, glucono-δ-lactone and microbial transglutaminase

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 71, 期 -, 页码 234-242

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2016.03.032

关键词

Soy protein; Bioaccessibility; Coagulant; In vitro gastrointestinal digestion

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31501466]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20150660]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [KJQN201647]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  5. Jiangsu Provincial Double-Creative Doctorate Plan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Food matrix may regulate the nutrients releasing profiles during human digestion. In the present study, soy protein gel was prepared by magnesium chloride (MgCl2), glucono-delta-lactone (GDL), and microbial transglutaminase (MTGase) as coagulant, respectively, and using an in vitro gastrointestinal simulated digestion (GIS) model, the effect of different coagulants on soy protein degradation was investigated. Our results showed that gel induced by MTGase, regardless of concentration, had significantly lower (P < 0.05) in vitro protein digestibility, in comparison with the other coagulants. Protein degradation occurred more rapidly at the initial phase of gastric digestion for the gel prepared with GDL rather than that of MgCl2, whereas both gels possessed an undigested 25 kDa band at the end of intestinal digestion. Also, smaller peptides (<10 kDa) gradually increased during the digestion and GDL gel reached the highest peptide content of 3.73 mg/ml after GIS. MTGase gel possessed the least peptide amount and free amino acid content at the end of GIS. The results demonstrated structure of soy protein network assembled by different coagulant had vital influence on the protein bioaccessibility. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据