4.7 Article

State Compensation for Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships' Remote Control

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jmse11020450

关键词

remote control ship; delay compensation; state estimation; AS-CKF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the development of emerging techniques, maritime autonomous surface ships (MASS) have attracted much attention, and the future of remote control ships looks promising. However, the challenge of time delay in ship-shore transmission due to communication issues hinders effective control and stability. To address this, an Augmented State Cubature Kalman Filter (AS-CKF) is proposed to compensate for uncertain delays. Simulation results demonstrate improvements compared to traditional methods, indicating the potential of the proposed AS-CKF in remote control MASS.
With the development of emerging techniques, maritime autonomous surface ships (MASS) have attracted much attention, and the remote control ships' future seems promising. However, due to communication issues, ship-shore transmission faces the challenge of time delay. The use of the transmitted information without compensation could reduce the effectiveness of controlling or could cause the remote control to be unstable. To eliminate the negative effects of uncertain delays during navigation, an Augmented State Cubature Kalman Filter (AS-CKF) is proposed. First, the uncertainty of the transmission delays is modeled using a probability density function (PDF). Second, the ship's states are updated and estimated using the delayed observed data, and then the real state of the ship is simultaneously corrected in the augmented state vector. In this way, the delay compensation problem becomes a one-step prediction problem. To test the proposed AS-CKF for MASS, we simulate scenarios with the remote control ship under different communication time delays. The results show improvements compared to the traditional CKF, EKF, or AS-EKF, which indicates the potential of the proposed methods in remote control MASS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据