4.3 Article

Quantifying dissolution rates of Antarctic icebergs in open water

期刊

ANNALS OF GLACIOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/aog.2023.26

关键词

Antarctic glaciology; ice; ocean interactions; iceberg calving; icebergs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

At any one time 130,000 icebergs are afloat in the Southern Ocean, with 97% of them too small to be registered in current satellite databases. We derive average iceberg dissolution rates using visual size observations from the SCAR International Iceberg Database, finding that fracture into two parts is the dominant dissolution process. The largest injection of fresh water and iceberg-transported material into the Southern Ocean occurs in a specific zone extending from the Antarctic Peninsula to the Greenwich meridian.
At any one time 130 000 icebergs are afloat in the Southern Ocean; 97% of these are too small to be registered in current satellite-based databases, yet the melting of these small icebergs provides a major input to the Southern Ocean. We use a unique set of visual size observations of 53 000 icebergs in the South Atlantic Ocean, the SCAR International Iceberg Database, to derive average iceberg dissolution rates. Fracture into two parts is the dominant dissolution process for tabular icebergs, with an average half-life of 30 days for icebergs < 4 km length and 60 days for larger icebergs. Complete shatter producing many icebergs < 1 km length is rare. A side attrition rate of 0.23 m d(-1) combined with drift speed of 6 km d(-1), or any proportional change in both numbers fits the observed changes in iceberg distribution. The largest injection into the Southern Ocean of fresh water and any iceberg-transported material takes place in a similar to 2.3 x 10(6); km(2) zone extending east-northeast from the Antarctic Peninsula to the Greenwich meridian. The iceberg contribution to salinities and temperatures, with maximum contribution north of the Weddell Sea, differs in some regions, from those indicated by tracking large icebergs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据