4.8 Article

Robust Anode-Free Sodium Metal Batteries Enabled by Artificial Sodium Formate Interface

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 13, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202204125

关键词

anode-free batteries; sodium dendrites; sodium formate; sodium metal anodes; sodium metal batteries

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is demonstrated that sodium formate (HCOONa), a component of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), can be used to design high-performance artificial SEI layers, which effectively suppress sodium dendrite formation and side reactions with the electrolyte. A single molecular layer of HCOONa formed on a commercial copper current collector extends the lifespan of anode-free Cu|Na3V2(PO4)(3) battery to 400 cycles, representing the longest reported cycle lifetime in anode-free NMBs.
Sodium metal batteries (NMBs) have attracted increasing attention as next-generation rechargeable batteries. How to improve their cycling stability and safety under limited sodium excess conditions, ideally zero sodium excess (i.e., anode-free architecture), is highly desired yet remains challenging. Herein, it is demonstrated that sodium formate (HCOONa), one component of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) naturally formed on sodium metal anode, is a promising candidate for designing high-performance artificial SEI layers, which can suppress the sodium dendrite formation and reduce the side reactions between sodium and the electrolyte. Profiting from the HCOONa interface, the Na|Na3V2(PO4)(3) battery with a high mass loading of Na3V2(PO4)(3) (10 mg cm(-2)) exhibits a superior cycling stability with an ultralow decay rate of 0.004% per cycle over 800 cycles. More impressively, a single molecular layer of HCOONa in situ formed on commercial copper current collector helps to extend the lifespan of the anode-free Cu|Na3V2(PO4)(3) battery to 400 cycles with 88.2% capacity relation, representing the longest cycle lifetime reported in anode-free NMBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据