4.7 Article

Tumor necrosis factor receptors 1 and 2 are associated with early glomerular lesions in type 2 diabetes

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 89, 期 1, 页码 226-234

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2015.278

关键词

diabetic nephropathy; endothelium; kidney biopsy

资金

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  2. American Diabetes Association (Clinical Science Award) [1-08-CR-42]
  3. National Institutes of Health: DRC [P30DK036836, DK41526, DK67638]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Elevated serum tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNFR1) and 2 (TNFR2) concentrations are strongly associated with increased risk of end-stage renal disease in type 2 diabetes. However, little is known about the early glomerular structural lesions that develop in patients when these markers are elevated. Here, we examined the relationships between TNFRs and glomerular structure in 83 American Indians with type 2 diabetes. Serum TNFRs and glomerular filtration rate (GFR, iothalamate) were measured during a research exam performed within a median of 0.9 months from a percutaneous kidney biopsy. Associations of TNFRs with glomerular structural variables were quantified by Spearman's correlations and by multivariable linear regression after adjustment for age, gender, diabetes duration, hemoglobin A1c, body mass index, and mean arterial pressure. The baseline mean age was 46 years, median GFR 130 ml/min, median albumin/creatinine ratio 26 mg/g, median TNFR1 1500 pg/ml, and median TNFR2 3284 pg/ml. After multivariable adjustment, TNFR1 and TNFR2 significantly correlated inversely with the percentage of endothelial cell fenestration and the total filtration surface per glomerulus. There were significant positive correlations with mesangial fractional volume, glomerular basement membrane width, podocyte foot process width, and percentage of global glomerular sclerosis. Thus, TNFRs may be involved in the pathogenesis of early glomerular lesions in diabetic nephropathy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据