4.8 Article

Oxidized mitochondrial DNA induces gasdermin D oligomerization in systemic lupus erythematosus

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-36522-z

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates that the pore-forming protein GSDMD is involved in the release of mitochondrial DNA in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. GSDMD oligomerization and cell death are induced by the oxidation of mtDNA, which is regulated by the downregulation of Serpinb1. These findings suggest that GSDMD could be a potential therapeutic target in SLE.
Although extracellular DNA is known to form immune complexes (ICs) with autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), the mechanisms leading to the release of DNA from cells remain poorly characterized. Here, we show that the pore-forming protein, gasdermin D (GSDMD), is required for nuclear DNA and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) release from neutrophils and lytic cell death following ex vivo stimulation with serum from patients with SLE and IFN-gamma. Mechanistically, the activation of Fc gamma R downregulated Serpinb1 following ex vivo stimulation with serum from patients with SLE, leading to spontaneous activation of both caspase-1/caspase-11 and cleavage of GSDMD into GSDMD-N. Furthermore, mtDNA oxidization promoted GSDMD-N oligomerization and cell death. In addition, GSDMD, but not peptidyl arginine deiminase 4 is necessary for extracellular mtDNA release from low-density granulocytes from SLE patients or healthy human neutrophils following incubation with ICs. Using the pristane-induced lupus model, we show that disease severity is significantly reduced in mice with neutrophil-specific Gsdmd deficiency or following treatment with the GSDMD inhibitor, disulfiram. Altogether, our study highlights an important role for oxidized mtDNA in inducing GSDMD oligomerization and pore formation. These findings also suggest that GSDMD might represent a possible therapeutic target in SLE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据