4.5 Article

Analyzing Dyadic Data Using Grid-Sequence Analysis: Interdyad Differences in Intradyad Dynamics

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbw160

关键词

Dyadic analysis; Experience sampling; Interpersonal dynamics; Longitudinal analysis

资金

  1. National Institute on Health [R01 HD076994, R24 HD041025, UL TR000127]
  2. Penn State Social Science Research Institute
  3. German Research Foundation [DFG: GE 1896/6-1]
  4. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [R01HD076994, R24HD041025] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Spouses are proximal contexts for and influence each other's behaviors, particularly in old age. In this article, we forward an integrated approach that merges state space grid methods adapted from the dynamic systems literature with sequence analysis methods adapted from molecular biology into a grid-sequence method for studying interdyad differences in intradyad dynamics. Method: Using dyadic data from 108 older couples (M-Age = 75.18 years) with six within-day emotion and activity reports over 7 days, we illustrate how grid-sequence analysis can be used to identify a taxonomy of dyads with different emotion dynamics. Results: Results provide a basis for measuring a set of dyad-level variables that capture dynamic equilibrium, daily routines, and interdyad differences. Specifically, we identified four groups of dyads who differed in how their moment-to-moment happiness was organized, with some evidence that these patterns were related to dyad-level differences in agreement on amount of time spent with partner and in subjective health. Discussion: Methodologically, grid-sequence analysis extends the toolbox of techniques for analysis of dyadic experience sampling data. Substantively, we identify patterns of dyad-level microdynamics that may serve as new markers of risk/protective factors and potential points for intervention in older adults' proximal context.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据