4.2 Article

Patterns of morphological variation among populations of the widespread annual killifish Nothobranchius orthonotus are independent of genetic divergence and biogeography

出版社

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1111/jzs.12134

关键词

Geometric morphometry; body shape; species delimitation; annual killifish; Nothobranchius

资金

  1. Czech Science Foundation GACR [P505/12/G112]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Populations of annual killifish of the genus Nothobranchius occur in patchily distributed temporary pools in the East African savannah. Their fragmented distribution and low dispersal ability result in highly structured genetic clustering of their populations. In this study, we examined body shape variation in a widely distributed species, Nothobranchius orthonotus with known phylogeographic structure. We tested whether genetic divergence of major mitochondrial lineages forming two candidate species is congruent with phenotypic diversification, using linear and geometric morphometry analyses of body shape in 23 wild populations. We also conducted a common-garden experiment with two wild-derived populations to control for the effect of local environmental conditions on body shape. We identified different allometric trajectories for different mitochondrial lineages and candidate species in both sexes. However, in a principal components analysis of population-level body shape, the separation among mitochondrial lineages was incomplete. Higher similarity of mitochondrial lineages belonging to different candidate species than that of same candidate species prevented distinction of the two candidate species on the basis of body shape. Analysis at the individual level demonstrated that N.orthonotus express high intrapopulation variability, with major overlap among individuals from all populations. In conclusion, we suggest that N.orthonotus be considered as a single species with an extensive geographic range, strong population genetic structure and high morphological variability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据