3.9 Article

Between Old and New Interpretations of Life: Animal Electricity at the First Congress of Italian Scientists

期刊

PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
卷 25, 期 1-2, 页码 3-40

出版社

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00016-023-00296-0

关键词

Luigi Pacinotti; Francesco Puccintti; animal electricity; vis vitalis; history of electrophysiology; electrovital currents

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In 1839, Francesco Puccinotti and Luigi Pacinotti successfully measured electrovital currents in live animals. They used a galvanometer developed by Leopoldo Nobili for the experiment, which took place during the First Congress of Italian Scientists. The conflicting views of doctors and physicists during the Congress sparked a debate and stimulated further electrophysiological studies in Italy.
In 1839, collaborating with physicist Luigi Pacinotti, the Italian physician and historian of medicine Francesco Puccinotti announced a successful measurement of the existence of electrovital currents in live warm- and cold-blooded animals. To perform this measurement, they used the astatic galvanometer developed by Leopoldo Nobili. The experimental demonstrations took place in Pisa on the morning of October 13, 1839 as part of the First Congress of Italian Scientists. The experiment had been carefully prepared and tested ahead of the Congress in June and July of the same year. Two congressional commissions, composed respectively of doctors and physicists, discussed the results of the experiments and disclosed conflicting views. The physicists diplomatically expressed doubt, saying that the current measured might have been similar, although weaker, to that found in already dead animals and therefore could be traced to physicochemical processes. A debate developed at the Congress and continued afterwards. This significant episode helped keep the question of animal electricity open in Italy, stimulating the development of new electrophysiological studies in the following decade.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据