4.7 Article

Colorization of infrared images based on feature fusion and contrastive learning

期刊

OPTICS AND LASERS IN ENGINEERING
卷 162, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2022.107395

关键词

Infrared colorization; Contrastive learning; Feature fusion; Image translation

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes an improved generator structure and a new contrastive loss function to tackle the problem of converting infrared images to RGB images that match human eye perception. The developed generator effectively captures features at different levels and integrates them by feature fusion. The new contrastive loss function ensures the consistency of the content and structure of the images. Experimental results demonstrate the superior colorization performance of our method compared to state-of-the-art approaches.
Converting infrared images to RGB images that match human eye perception is a challenging task. Current in-frared image coloring techniques can bring visual improvements, but still suffer from texture distortion, blurred details, and poor image quality. In this paper, we work on solving the above problems. First, we design an im-proved generator structure. On the basis of Unet, we add dense convolutional blocks and skip connections to integrate low-level detail information with high-level semantic information. The developed generator can cap-ture features at different levels and integrate them by feature fusion. It ensures that the captured features are not lost. Second, we design a new contrastive loss function. Based on the contrastive learning framework, this function focuses on learning common features between similar instances and distinguishing differences between non-similar instances. This ensures the consistency of the content and structure of the images. Finally, an in-depth contrast analysis is conducted based on commonly used datasets to demonstrate the superior colorization performance of our method against the state-of-the-art approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据