4.7 Article

Swimming against ALS: How to model disease in zebrafish for pathophysiological and behavioral studies

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105138

关键词

Zebrafish; Danio rerio; Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis; Animal models; SOD1; FUS; C9ORF72; TARDBP; TDP-43; Behavior

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease that causes disability and motor impairment. Zebrafish has emerged as a promising model for studying ALS due to its similarities to humans and the ability to study behavioral and pathophysiological phenotypes. This review discusses the relevance of zebrafish in ALS studies, model induction strategies, and various zebrafish models of ALS, highlighting their validity and potential for drug testing.
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease that leads to progressive disability and motor impairment. Existing therapies provide modest improvements in patient survival, raising a need for new treat-ments for ALS. Zebrafish is a promising model animal for translational and fundamental research in ALS - it is an experimentally tractable vertebrate, with high homology to humans and an ample experimental toolbox. These advantages allow high-throughput study of behavioral and pathophysiological phenotypes. The last decade saw an increased interest in modelling ALS in zebrafish, leading to the current abundance and variety of available methods and models. Additionally, the rise of gene editing techniques and toxin combination studies has created novel opportunities for ALS studies in zebrafish. In this review, we address the relevance of zebrafish as a model animal for ALS studies, the strategies for model induction and key phenotypical evaluation. Furthermore, we discuss established and emerging zebrafish models of ALS, analyzing their validity, including their potential for drug testing, and highlighting research opportunities in this area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据