4.8 Article

Puddle formation and persistent gaps across the non-mean-field breakdown of superconductivity in overdoped (Pb,Bi)2Sr2CuO6+δ

期刊

NATURE MATERIALS
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 703-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41563-023-01497-1

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Superconductivity in high-doped cuprate superconductors is found to be qualitatively different from conventional mean-field theory, as the superfluid density vanishes when the transition temperature goes to zero, which contradicts expectations from Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer theory. Scanning tunnelling spectroscopy measurements reveal the emergence of nanoscale superconducting puddles in a metallic matrix, driven by gap filling instead of gap closing, indicating that the breakdown of superconductivity is not caused by diminishing pairing interaction.
The cuprate high-temperature superconductors exhibit many unexplained electronic phases, but the superconductivity at high doping is often believed to be governed by conventional mean-field Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer theory(1). However, it was shown that the superfluid density vanishes when the transition temperature goes to zero(2,3), in contradiction to expectations from Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer theory. Our scanning tunnelling spectroscopy measurements in the overdoped regime of the (Pb,Bi)(2)Sr2CuO6+delta high-temperature superconductor show that this is due to the emergence of nanoscale superconducting puddles in a metallic matrix(4,5). Our measurements further reveal that this puddling is driven by gap filling instead of gap closing. The important implication is that it is not a diminishing pairing interaction that causes the breakdown of superconductivity. Unexpectedly, the measured gap-to-filling correlation also reveals that pair breaking by disorder does not play a dominant role and that the mechanism of superconductivity in overdoped cuprate superconductors is qualitatively different from conventional mean-field theory.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据