4.6 Article

Facial depth forgery detection based on image gradient

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-023-14626-4

关键词

Facial depth forgery detection; DeepFakes detection; Image gradient; Deep learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the widespread application of deep learning, detecting and recognizing fake images or videos has become a significant research focus. To tackle new facial depth forgery techniques, we proposed an image gradient-based approach that transforms the detection problem into video frame recognition and analysis. Our extensive experiments on various datasets demonstrated that our approach effectively detects and identifies facial depth forgery with excellent performance.
With the widespread application of deep learning, many artificially generated fake images and videos appear on the Internet. However, it is difficult for people to distinguish the real from the fake ones, making the research on detecting and recognizing fake images or videos receive significant attention. Since new forgery techniques can reduce the effectiveness of specific detection methods or even make them ineffective, research on detecting facial depth forgery needs to be continuously developed. To defend against the onslaught of new facial depth forgery methods, we proposed an image gradient-based approach to transform the facial depth forgery detection problem into the recognition and analysis of video frames. Specifically, there are two key components in this approach: (1) we capture images from videos and crop the face section, which dramatically reduces the amount of data; (2) we use the image gradient operator to process the face image that extracts image features for detection and recognition. After these, we have conducted extensive experiments on different facial depth forgery datasets. Experimental results demonstrated that using our image gradient approach could effectively detect facial depth forgery and achieve excellent detection and identification performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据