4.7 Article

Calnexin, an ER-induced protein, is a prognostic marker and potential therapeutic target in colorectal cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12967-016-0948-z

关键词

Colorectal cancer; ER Stress; Calnexin; GRP78; GRP94; UPR (unfolded protein response)

资金

  1. Health Research Board [TRA/2007/26]
  2. Science Foundation Ireland [13/IA/1881]
  3. European Union [306021]
  4. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [13/IA/1881] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)
  5. Health Research Board (HRB) [TRA-2007-26] Funding Source: Health Research Board (HRB)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer mortality in the Western world and commonly treated with genotoxic chemotherapy. Stress in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) was implicated to contribute to chemotherapeutic resistance. Hence, ER stress related protein may be of prognostic or therapeutic significance. Methods: The expression levels of ER stress proteins calnexin, calreticulin, GRP78 and GRP94 were determined in n = 23 Stage II and III colon cancer fresh frozen tumour and matched normal tissue samples. Data were validated in a cohort of n = 11 rectal cancer patients treated with radiochemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting. The calnexin gene was silenced using siRNA in HCT116 cells. Results: There were no increased levels of ER stress proteins in tumour compared to matched normal tissue samples in Stage II or III CRC. However, increased calnexin protein levels were predictive of poor clinical outcome in the patient cohort. Data were validated in the rectal cancer cohort treated in the neoadjuvant setting. Calnexin gene-silencing significantly reduced cell survival and increased cancer cell susceptibility to 5FU chemotherapy. Conclusion: Increased tumour protein levels of calnexin may be of prognostic significance in CRC, and calnexin may represent a potential target for future therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据