4.0 Article

Evaluation of mouse behavioral responses to nutritive versus nonnutritive sugar using a deep learning-based 3D real-time pose estimation system

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROGENETICS
卷 37, 期 1-2, 页码 78-83

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01677063.2023.2174982

关键词

Deep learning based; 3D real-time pose estimation; mouse behavior; nutritive vs. nonnutritive sugar; two-choice assay

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Animals can detect the nutritional content of sugar independently of taste. When given a choice, animals prefer nutritive sugar over nonnutritive sugar during food deprivation. Using a 3D pose estimation system called AVATAR, researchers found that mice exhibit different behavioral responses toward nutritive and nonnutritive sugar even before licking a sugar solution. This suggests that the nutritional value of sugar promotes its consumption and elicits distinct feeding behavior in deprived mice.
Animals are able to detect the nutritional content of sugar independently of taste. When given a choice between nutritive sugar and nonnutritive sugar, animals develop a preference for nutritive sugar over nonnutritive sugar during a period of food deprivation (Buchanan et al., 2022; Dus et al., 2011; 2015; Tan et al., 2020; Tellez et al., 2016). To quantify behavioral features during an episode of licking nutritive versus nonnutritive sugar, we implemented a multi-vision, deep learning-based 3D pose estimation system, termed the AI Vision Analysis for Three-dimensional Action in Real-Time (AVATAR)(Kim et al., 2022). Using this method, we found that mice exhibit significantly different approach behavioral responses toward nutritive sugar versus nonnutritive sugar even before licking a sugar solution. Notably, the behavioral sequences during the approach toward nutritive versus nonnutritive sugar became significantly different over time. These results suggest that the nutritional value of sugar not only promotes its consumption but also elicits distinct repertoires of feeding behavior in deprived mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据