4.7 Article

Ferroptosis inducers enhanced cuproptosis induced by copper ionophores in primary liver cancer

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13046-023-02720-2

关键词

Cuproptosis; Ferroptosis; Copper ionophores; Lipoylation; Ferredoxin 1 (FDX1)

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that ferroptosis inducers sorafenib and erastin could enhance cuproptosis in primary liver cancer cells by increasing copper dependent lipoylated protein aggregation. Mechanically, sorafenib and erastin upregulated protein lipoylation via suppressing mitochondrial matrix-related proteases mediated ferredoxin 1 (FDX1) protein degradation, and reduced intracellular copper chelator glutathione (GSH) synthesis through inhibiting cystine importing.
IntroductionCuproptosis and ferroptosis are the two newly defined metal-related regulated cell death. However, the crosstalk between cuproptosis and ferroptosis is obscure.Materials and methodsWe analyzed the effect of ferroptosis inducers on copper ionophores-induced cell death through CCK-8 assay. Cuproptosis was studied using immunofluorescence and protein soluble-insoluble fraction isolation. GSH assay, qRT-PCR and western blot were adopted to explore the machinery of ferroptosis inducers enhanced cuproptosis. And mouse xenograft model was built to detect the synergy effect of elesclomol-Cu and sorafenib in vivo.ResultsHerein we found that ferroptosis inducers sorafenib and erastin could enhance cuproptosis in primary liver cancer cells by increasing copper dependent lipoylated protein aggregation. Mechanically, sorafenib and erastin upregulated protein lipoylation via suppressing mitochondrial matrix-related proteases mediated ferredoxin 1 (FDX1) protein degradation, and reduced intracellular copper chelator glutathione (GSH) synthesis through inhibiting cystine importing.Discussion/ConclusionOur findings proposed that combination of ferroptosis inducers and copper ionophores to co-targeting ferroptosis and cuproptosis could be a novel therapeutic strategy for primary liver cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据