4.5 Article

Research advances on metal fuels without carbon dioxide emissions

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15435075.2023.2201346

关键词

Metal Combustion; iron; aluminum; combustion model; flame propagation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nowadays, the transition from fossil to renewable energy is underway, but the fluctuating nature of green electricity, such as solar and wind power, poses challenges for efficient utilization. Hydrogen production from water electrolysis is an important pathway, but storage remains challenging. A new approach of utilizing renewable energy efficiently has been proposed, which involves using renewable energy to prepare metals and then using metal combustion for heating. This work reviews the combustion models and characteristics of iron and aluminum fuels under different conditions, with the aim of benefiting the development of this field.
Nowadays we are gradually transitioning from fossil to renewable energy in our energy consumption, but the green electricity, represented by solar and wind power, is highly fluctuating and difficult to use efficiently. Hydrogen production from electrolysis of water is currently an important pathway to consume green electricity, yet hydrogen still faces difficulties in large - scale long - term storage. Subsequently, a new pathway for the efficient use of renewable energy has been proposed: powering by renewable energy - preparing metal by electrolysis - heating by metal combustion. Metals are easy to store, and transport and its market is large. This makes it possible to realize the large - scale long - term storage of fluctuating renewable energy. In this new technical route, metal combustion is a crucial element. This work reviews the combustion models of iron and aluminum as fuels, and discusses their combustion characteristics under different particle sizes and microgravity conditions, as well as the flame propagation process. We hope that our work will benefit the development of this field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据