4.6 Article

Characterization of three-dimensional anisotropic heart valve tissue mechanical properties using inverse finite element analysis

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.04.031

关键词

Inverse finite element simulation; Medical device; Heart valves; Stress; Three-dimensional anisotropic; mechanical properties; Fung constitutive model; Viscous damping coefficient

资金

  1. Knoebel Center for the Study of Aging and Professional Research Opportunity Funds [142235]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Computational modeling has an important role in design and assessment of medical devices. In computational simulations, considering accurate constitutive models is of the utmost importance to capture mechanical response of soft tissue and biomedical materials under physiological loading conditions. Lack of comprehensive three-dimensional constitutive models for soft tissue limits the effectiveness of computational modeling in research and development of medical devices. The aim of this study was to use inverse finite element (FE) analysis to determine three-dimensional mechanical properties of bovine pericardial leaflets of a surgical bioprosthesis under dynamic loading condition. Using inverse parameter estimation, 3D anisotropic Fung model parameters were estimated for the leaflets. The FE simulations were validated using experimental in-vitro measurements, and the impact of different constitutive material models was investigated on leaflet stress distribution. The results of this study showed that the anisotropic Fung model accurately simulated the leaflet deformation and coaptation during valve opening and closing. During systole, the peak stress reached to 3.17 MPa at the leaflet boundary while during diastole high stress regions were primarily observed in the commissures with the peak stress of 1.17 MPa. In addition, the Rayleigh damping coefficient that was introduced to FE simulations to simulate viscous damping effects of surrounding fluid was determined. 9C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据