4.3 Article

Monitoring and Analysis of Land Subsidence Along Beijing-Tianjin Inter-City Railway

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12524-016-0556-7

关键词

Beijing-Tianjin railway; Uneven land subsidence; InSAR(Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar); Groundwater

资金

  1. State Key Program of National Natural Science of China [41130744]
  2. State General Program of National Natural Science of China [41171335]
  3. National Natural Science of China [41401492]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Land subsidence, as a slow and persistent geological disaster, threatens the safety of urban constructions and linear structures. Beijing-Tianjin intercity railway was built across some of the severe subsidence funnels. By combining with the hydrogeology condition and the InSAR (Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar) monitoring result, the corresponding analysis was conducted to reveal the situation and variational rule of the railway subsidence. Several indicators such as gradient, profiles and time-series analysis were used for describing the the land settlement along and across the railway. The result shows that areas with thick compressible layers, frequent over-exploitation and great decline of groundwater has larger subsidence rate. The middle confined groundwater level has much closer trend with subsidence than shallow groundwater. The railway is threatened by the subsidence along it, despite massive efforts are done to avoid crossing the subsidence cones in the railway route selection. The gradient, which is used to describe the uneven subsidence, shows some extrema at the edge area of the subsidence bowl. The maximal gradient value which means the most serious non-uniform settlement of the railway happens at a distance of 14200 m from the beginning. The profiles of the three lines have relatively larger vertical velocity in the middle where the railway goes through. With time goes by, the cumulative non-uniform deformation along the railway should be paid enough attention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据